Skip to content
Resources

Tools for the people who run the programs.

Reference material we built because we needed it ourselves, published for anyone administering rental assistance. Free, no sign-in, every claim carrying the citation behind it.

Compliance reference

HOTMA applicability matrix

Which HOTMA provisions reach which HUD program.

Most of what the sector calls HOTMA lives in 24 CFR part 5, which was written for Section 8 and public housing. A CPD program is bound only where its own regulation cites it. Every cell here states what that program's own rule says, with the citation that supports it.

  • 23 provisions across 10 HUD programs, 230 cells
  • A citation in every cell, verified against primary sources
  • Filter to the programs you run, or to where they differ

Free · No sign-in · Updated for CY2027 figures

The HOTMA applicability matrix: provisions down the left, ten HUD programs across the top, and a grid of cells coloured by whether each provision applies, is available by election, does not apply, or is not addressed
For funders

Funders see outcomes

The work that produces them is mostly invisible.

Funders resource housing programs and measure outcomes. Between the two sits the work of running them — rent calculation, documentation, payment sequencing, landlord relationships, unit inventory. When that layer is fragmented across providers, the cost does not appear in a grant report. What appears is an underspent allocation and a placement count below projection.

  • Why allocations age against deadlines nobody in the system controls
  • What it costs when every provider executes rental assistance differently
  • How communities are funding the coordination layer directly

Written for funders, and for the grantees describing program operations

The Padmission for-funders page: a dark hero reading "Funders see outcomes. The work that produces them is mostly invisible."
Case studies

Unlocked

What actually happened when a community centralized the work.

Seven communities, written from the implementation rather than the pitch: what they had before, what they changed, what it cost them to get there, and what moved afterwards. Named communities, named people, and figures they were willing to stand behind.

  • NMCEH cut housing search time in Albuquerque from 90 days to 46
  • RentSelect helped cut family homelessness in Montgomery County by 47%
  • HOM, Inc. brought 2,500+ households onto one standard across Los Angeles
The Unlocked series archive: community success stories from Montgomery County, Albuquerque and Los Angeles, each with a photograph and headline
Field notes

Hear about the next one first.

One email a month. New tools when we publish them, and the same notes our customer-success team sends to housing program leaders.